1. Ethics for Author (s)

1.1 Originality and Plagiarism

Manuscripts submitted for publication must be original and should not have been previously published or under consideration for publication elsewhere. Authors should properly cite sources when using others' work and avoid any form of plagiarism. And Plagiarism Should not be More than 15 %.

1.2 Authorship

Only those Authors who have Contributed Significantly to the Research Should be listed. Those who have not Contributed Significantly Should not be listed as a Author’s. Author should also ensure that all Co Authors have seen and approved the Final Version of the Manuscript.

1.3 Conflict of Interest 

Editors, authors, and peer reviewers should disclose interests that might appear to affect their ability to present or review work objectively. These might include relevant financial interests (for example, patent ownership, stock ownership, consultancies, or speaker's fees), or personal, political, or religious interests.

1.4 Data Integrity

The Author are Responsible for the Accuracy and Completeness of the Information Presented in the Manuscript. Any Data Manipulation or Selective Reporting Should be avoided.

1.5 Multiple, Duplicative or Simultaneous Publication

Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable An Author Should not Publish an Article in More Than One Journal. The Author Should not Submit an Article That Author Previously Submitted to another Journal.

1.6 Acknowledgement of Sources

The purpose of acknowledging sources is to demonstrate intellectual honesty, respect for the contributions of others, and adherence to academic and ethical standards of Publication. It also allows readers to verify the information presented and to locate the original sources for further study. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

1.7 Errors in Published Work

When Author (s) Find an Errors in Published Article He/she Responsible to Inform the Journal Editor and Coordinate with him/her the Article to and Send the Revised Version to the Journal. The Author has Permission to Revise the Article Three Times after Publication. 

2. Ethics for Editor

2.1. Fairness and Impartiality

The editor will evaluate manuscripts without regard to the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy.

2.2. Transparency

Editors should be Transparent about Their Editorial Processes, Including Peer Review procedures, Publication timelines, and any Conflicts of Interest that may arise.

2.3. Respect for Author (s)

Editors should respect the intellectual property rights of authors and should provide constructive feedback and support throughout the publication process.

2.4. Confidentiality

Editors should not disclose author Manuscripts as Confidential Documents to anyone other than Reviewers and Appropriate Editorial Staff. 

2.5. Publication Decisions

The Editor-in Chief will be Responsible for deciding which of the Papers Submitted to the Journal should be published.

2.6. Conflict of Interest

Editors should refrain from evaluating the work of authors or researchers with whom they have conflicts of interest and affinity and managing the relevant publication process.

2.7. Plagiarism and Copyright

Editors should be vigilant in detecting and preventing plagiarism, ensuring that all content is original or properly attributed. They should also respect copyright laws and obtain permission for the use of copyrighted material when necessary.

3. Ethics for Reviewer

3.1. Contribute to the Publication Process

This is Very Importance Process and is designed to verify the Authenticity, Originality and Validity of Articles before Publication. If the reviewer knows that he is not capable of this process or cannot complete the review process on time, he should not accept the job offer as a reviewer.

3.2 Upholding Scientific Integrity

To ensure the rigorous standards of the scientific process by taking part in the peer-review system.

3.3 Confidentiality

The reviewer should consider the author's article a confidential document. The reviewer should not share his report or the content of the article with anyone else, nor should he contact the author without the editor's permission. Reviewers are not allowed to make copies of the manuscripts for their own needs.

3.4 Identification of Ethical Issues

Reviews should be ethically responsible, and if any problem arises, they should inform the Editor. Ethical issues include the inclusion of similar information in other published articles that the reviewer is aware of and that has been included without the author's knowledge.

3.5. Ensuring Journal Integrity

Reviewer should rectify the integrity of the journal by identifying invalid research, and helping to maintain the quality of the journal.

 

3.6 Fairness & Conflicting Commitments

The reviewer must be objective and unbiased during the review process. The Reviewer must perform his/her duties impartially and ethically.

 

3.7 Professional Development

The reviewer should improve his skills and should be aware of the evaluation and performance of his actions during the review.